[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Nick Nicholas scripsit:
> And herein our misunderstanding. Because of course I didn't think of
> prototype in that way. And there is a long-running confusion as to
> what this Mr Bird is in Lojban; until recently, after all, we all
> assumed it was {loi cipni}. For all I know, it may in fact still be
> loi} and not {lo'e}.
I certainly have always used "Mr. X" to mean "loi X"; I saw Mr. Bird last
week, meaning that I saw some part of loi X, the massified glob-of-all-birds.
But I cannot perceive lo'e cipni in any sense.
> That said, the "I want to talk to a doctor/any doctor" is a
> far far better illustration of this intensional doctor, because we
> don't need to get sidetracked by {buska}.
I think the problem as stated is insufficiently general. After all,
why doesn't it apply with equal force to "I need eight maids a-milking?"
Does that mean some specific eight maids, or any eight maids?
In other contexts we talk about le bi vs. bi lo.
> My opinion is still that (b) wins out, that the Median is closer to
> the CLL's lion, and that something *like* {se ka} or {jai ka} would
> be good for the intensional lo'e, since it would directly and
> mnemonically tie in with the {sisku x2} (a fact on the Lojban ground.)
Is "Median" here meant as a prototype for the numerical senses only, or
does it include Prototype?
> Perhaps. Like I say, though, I don't know that Mr Doctor is lo'e
> mikce. In fact, I don't know yet that s/he isn't {loi mikce} after
> all. Massification suppresses individuation, so the choosing of
> opacity vs. transparency is sidestepped there too. Isn't it?
It is; in fact, if "do nitcu loi mikce", any doctor will satisfy you.
Technically, so will sundry detached doctor parts, but we can allow
the Gricean salvator to suppress this.
--
Only do what only you can do. John Cowan <jcowan@hidden.email>
--Edsger W. Dijkstra, http://www.reutershealth.com
deceased 6 August 2002 http://www.ccil.org/~cowan