[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 08:20:24AM -0700, Jorge Llambmas wrote:
> la djorden cusku di'e
> > Huh?!
> >
> > mi na broda gi'e broda meaning na (broda gi'e broda) would be nuts.
> >
> > The na is part of the selbri.
>
> I agree with you, but that's the official interpretation.
> They wanted {na} to be exportable to the prenex.
Not the way I read the grammar.
selbri-1;
: selbri-2
| NA # selbri
And the gi'e is out in the bridi-tail rule which contains the selbri.
So the na is deeper in the tree. (I.e. this is the mi ((na broda)
gi'e (broda)) way---the non-nuts way).
Or maybe I'm confused about what you mean?
--
Jordan DeLong - fracture@hidden.email
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku
Attachment:
bin5vkkHJ_yyF.bin
Description: application/ygp-stripped