[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Jorge Llambías wrote: > > la xod cusku di'e > > > And and Jorge, I'd appreciate it if you might write up this new model > > under http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/jboske%20whitepapers in > > language that slobs like me can understand. > > I started doing so here: > http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/XS%20gadri%20proposal > > I will add clarifications as needed. Please post comments if there are > things that remain unclear. Quite elegant. Now, what about lo'e itself? I don't see why we need a separate gadri for definitions, when they are handled with ro or ka'u ro. And in any case they are notoriously tricky; it's not a definitional trait of the lion that it is seen by me, etc. Yet most people interpret the CLL's treatment as na'o. -- The Pentagon group believed it had a visionary strategy that would transform Iraq into an ally of Israel, remove a potential threat to the Persian Gulf oil trade and encircle Iran with U.S. friends and allies...