[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
la xod cusku di'e > > http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/XS%20gadri%20proposal > > Now, what about lo'e itself? I don't see why we need a > separate gadri for definitions, when they are handled with ro or ka'u ro. > And in any case they are notoriously tricky; it's not a definitional trait > of the lion that it is seen by me, etc. Yet most people interpret the > CLL's treatment as na'o. lo'e/le'e/lo'i/le'i/loi/lei are ignored by this proposal: they are not needed, as everything is covered by lo and le. The rest can remain as close to the traditional definitions as desired, or they can be given somewhat more useful functions in some cases, but we should keep all that separate so as not to confuse the proposal. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com