[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: [jboske] Re: grammar & pseudogrammar



xorxes:
> la and cusku di'e
> 
> > It beggars belief that I can be credited with anything described
> > as The Official Interpretation!
> 
> Only because John gave his blessing... :)

For the record, John gives his blessing only to the notion that
the parse given by the formal grammar is not criterial to
determining the interpretation.

He does not endorse my proposal about na...gi'e (a proposal which
I now retract in favour of glorking).

--And.