[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u



At 04:18 PM 12/14/02 +1100, Nick Nicholas wrote:
4. The solomontean solution effectively wants a cmavo to attach to the
gadri, qualifying its epistemology. Since this is impossible, let us at
least insist that if this comes to pass (and I'm not a massive fan
right now), it attach to the sumti rather than the selbri --- since the
selbri is innocent of whatever people get up to when squinting. That
means not {lo'e merko be ma'e lesi'o cmacrnaveradja}, but {lo'e merko
NE ma'e lesi'o cmacrnaveradja}

I think this is what I said in my post, except that I would have presumed to use "pe" rather than "ne".

Sounds good to me.


--
lojbab                                             lojbab@hidden.email
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA                    703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org