[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] three pairs of shoes & excellent solutions



pier:
> On Wednesday 06 August 2003 10:38, Jorge "Llamb�as" wrote:
> > That's true. But {cutci remei ta'upei} is a legitimate question,
> > and we should have an answer.
> >
> > I would answer {remei lo'e cutci}.
>
> That has to be {remei lo'i cutci}

lo'i cutci is the set of all shoes. x2 of mei seems to be the set
corresponding to x1, so lo'i cutci is wrong for x2.

> as x2 of PAmei is a set. Or you could say {remei fi lo cutci}.

I don't know what "whose members are x3" means. If it means "whose
members include", then "fi lo cutci" means "pair containing at least
one shoe"".

--And.