[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
pier: > On Wednesday 06 August 2003 10:38, Jorge "Llamb�as" wrote: > > That's true. But {cutci remei ta'upei} is a legitimate question, > > and we should have an answer. > > > > I would answer {remei lo'e cutci}. > > That has to be {remei lo'i cutci} lo'i cutci is the set of all shoes. x2 of mei seems to be the set corresponding to x1, so lo'i cutci is wrong for x2. > as x2 of PAmei is a set. Or you could say {remei fi lo cutci}. I don't know what "whose members are x3" means. If it means "whose members include", then "fi lo cutci" means "pair containing at least one shoe"". --And.