[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
At 08:28 PM 12/18/02 +0000, And Rosta wrote:
Lojbab: > At 04:48 PM 12/18/02 +0000, And Rosta wrote: > >If you support or oppose the suggestion, please speak up > > Oppose > > 1. I want a 2 letter cmavo to abbreviate %^) > > 2. The real problems are a) too many topics at once and b) too much > unfocused discussion on each topic and c) none of us are that sure how the > current discussions relate to the actual work of the byfy (as evidenced by> some people talking about deferring some things until the byfy considers them)> > 3. The Board meeting is back in session again on its own list, and several > of your interlocutors have yet another thread to pay attention to besides > what appears on jboske and lojban list; I can rely on parliamentary > procedure to keep the Board meeting do a single thread at one time, but we > have no such discipline here > > I think that when the byfy list is set up, it needs to be single threaded > insofar as is possible, and let the multi-threading remain here on jboske I note that you oppose it, but I'm not sure why. Do you prefer Jboske discussion to continue in its present form?
Once the byfy operation is setup, then jboske has no reason to be other-than a free list, but if people want structure such as you describe, that is up to them (but I still suggest shorter codes). I myself will likely become silent again on jboske, since doing whatever Nick expects of byfy members will likely be more than I have time for.
lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@hidden.email Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org