[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on




la djan cusku di'e

> Nora asks, what do we do with "zi'o blanu".  She suspects that Xod would
> like to contemplate that as a Whorfian mind-blower; the projection analysis
> of zi'o would seem to indicate a meaning of some sort.

Sure.  It's a complete bridi, and it's false, you can say that much
right off (because the set of sumti-sequences that makes it true is null).

That's an odd definition of false. So would you say that
{zi'o na blanu} is a tautology?

I think {zi'o blanu} can be claimed when there is blueness
present but there is nothing of which we can or want to claim
that it is blue. {zi'o blanu} and {zi'o xunre} are different
predications.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus