[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 01:26:19PM +1100, Nick Nicholas wrote:
> cu'u la xorxes.
> >>I would like to make two further proposals (I want them to be
> >>taken jointly, not separately):
> >>
> >>* cmavo for Average are lo'e & le'e
> >>* cmavo for Unique are loi'e & lei'e and are made official.
>
> >I would prefer the reverse assignment, so that usage is not
> >invalidated.
>
> At which point I say ex cathedra that if usage turns out to be only
> your usage, it is not a sufficient argument. It has to be a plurality
> of Lojbanists' usage. If you are the only one to have used lo'e
> extensively, that still cannot count.
>
> Yes, this is adversarial, and I may well be wrong about you being the
> only user. But those are the ground rules for the BPFK.
I've been using "lo'e" and "le'e" in the statistical form (which I
think is consistent with the book, which is more important not to
invalidate than the (sometime addmittedly) experimental usage of
some people).
--
Jordan DeLong - fracture@hidden.email
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku
Attachment:
binF4k5pjB9bK.bin
Description: application/ygp-stripped