[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
cu'u la xorxes.
I would like to make two further proposals (I want them to be taken jointly, not separately): * cmavo for Average are lo'e & le'e * cmavo for Unique are loi'e & lei'e and are made official.
I would prefer the reverse assignment, so that usage is not invalidated.
At which point I say ex cathedra that if usage turns out to be only your usage, it is not a sufficient argument. It has to be a plurality of Lojbanists' usage. If you are the only one to have used lo'e extensively, that still cannot count.
Yes, this is adversarial, and I may well be wrong about you being the only user. But those are the ground rules for the BPFK.
-- **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** * Dr Nick Nicholas, French & Italian Studies nickn@hidden.email * University of Melbourne, Australia http://www.opoudjis.net * "Eschewing obfuscatory verbosity of locutional rendering, the * circumscriptional appelations are excised." --- W. Mann & S. Thompson, * _Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organisation_, 1987. * **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** ****