[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Nick: > cu'u la xorxes > >>I would like to make two further proposals (I want them to be > >>taken jointly, not separately): > >> > >>* cmavo for Average are lo'e & le'e > >>* cmavo for Unique are loi'e & lei'e and are made official > > >I would prefer the reverse assignment, so that usage is not > >invalidated > > At which point I say ex cathedra that if usage turns out to be only > your usage, it is not a sufficient argument. It has to be a plurality > of Lojbanists' usage. If you are the only one to have used lo'e > extensively, that still cannot count > > Yes, this is adversarial, and I may well be wrong about you being the > only user. But those are the ground rules for the BPFK I have used lo'e and le'e for Unique, but I consider my usage to be exploratory, and in no wise canonical, and I don't care if it gets invalidated. I consider all Lojban text written to date to be intrinsically invalid, because it is written on the basis of such an incomplete language and such an incomplete understanding of it. --And.