[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, And Rosta wrote: > xod: > > On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, John Cowan wrote: > > > > > Invent Yourself scripsit: > > > > > > > 1. Because the car is blue 90% of the time, as it's constantly > flickering > > > > colors? > > > > > > > > 2. Because we've never seen the car but we're 90% certain it's blue? > > > > > > > > 3. Because 90% of its surface is blue? > > > > > > > > 4. Because its color is objectively 90% blue? > > > > > > > > 5.Because 90% of survey respondents called it blue? > > > > > > Any or all of these might be evidence for the truthishness of the claim > > > When I said "certainty is neither here nor there," I was talking about > > > subjective certainty (= certitude). Objective uncertainty is a common > > > application of fuzzy logic: an OCR device may decide that a blob of ink > > > is (90%) an instance of "t", and is not (10%) an instance of "T" > > > Some predicates, like "tall", are inherently fuzzy > > > > It seems to me that this allows my original usage: that "jei by. clani" > is > > related to B's height > > I think you and me are on the same side on this one, but two > people of different heights can yield the same value for jei X clani. > To gauge the value of both ni clani and jei clani, you can measure > the height, but different values of ni can correspond to the same > value of jei. Tell me how, referring to the 5 sentences above? -- // if (!terrorist) // ignore (); // else collect_data ();