[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

Re: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?

• From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hidden.email>
• Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:58:41 +0000
• Subject: Re: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
• To: jboske@yahoogroups.com

la and cusku di'e

I would like to make two further proposals (I want them to be
taken jointly, not separately):

* cmavo for Average are lo'e & le'e
* cmavo for Unique are loi'e & lei'e and are made official.

I would prefer the reverse assignment, so that usage is not
invalidated.

mu'o mi'e xorxes




_________________________________________________________________

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
    • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@hidden.email>

• Prev by Date: Re: [jboske] jei clani (was: RE: Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka
• Next by Date: RE: [jboske] specificity of da (was: kau)
• Previous by thread: Off-site jboske help (was: lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?)
• Next by thread: RE: [jboske] lo'e gadri: can we converge towards a resolution?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread