[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Jordan DeLong wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 01:08:02PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, John Cowan wrote: > > > > > Invent Yourself scripsit: > > > > > > > This means that djuno contains two claims: by. jinvi cy., and mi jinvi cy. > > > > Just like in English. Blech. And then djuno4 is useless: it's always tu'a > > > > mi > > > > > > Well, in one sense, but I conceive the point of d4 to be to distinguish > > > which of multiple possible epistemologies I am entertaining. Perhaps I > > > distinguish physical and theological truth, e.g. (NOMA). > > > > Which means I *can* say mi zgana le za'i le'e xriso seljda cu djuno ko'a > > goi le du'u le nu nalspeni gletu cu xlali .i ku'i mi na jinvi ja krici > > ko'a, which is really all I wanted. > > I think you can't. > > To me the multiple epistemologies allow for things like explaining > whether you arrived at your conclusions using only constructive > proof or whether you allowed reducio, what kind of system you used > for the reasoning, etc. To me, theology doesn't count as reason, > and no one can djuno anything about it, only krici/jinvi/se mallijda. ja'o xu do na'e tugni mi .e la djan. -- // if (!terrorist) // ignore (); // else collect_data ();