[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
la djan cusku di'e
> Jorge Llamb?as scripsit:
>
> > Can we say that for every LAhE there is some broda that
> > can replace it so that {LAhE ko'a} = {lo broda be ko'a}?
>
> In principle, yes. I decline to speculate on exactly what those
> broda are, having tried to wrap my head around it at CLL time
> and failed.
lu'e/sinxa and la'e/selsni are given explicitly in CLL.
lu'a/cmima seems obvious. tu'a/datni also seems appropriate.
For lu'i, lu'o and vu'i we first need to understand what they
mean. Do they take cmima or selcmima? (Presumably all three
would be the same in this regard.) They can't take either,
because then there is an ambiguity, if ko'a has members
we don't know whether lu'i ko'a is a set with member ko'a
or a set with the members of ko'a as its members.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com