[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
la pier cusku di'e
> I have written a modification to the rafsi fu'ivla proposal which allows all
> type-3 fu'ivla ending in a single vowel as well as CCVVCV to have rafsi. It's
>
> at http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/rafsi%20fu'ivla . Can anyone shoot
> holes in it? Has anyone actually used a word that would be changed by this
> modification (a CCVVC fu'ivla rafsi both preceded and followed by another
> rafsi, with the rafsi preceding it not requiring a 'y' in the Book's
> proposal)?
I can't find any problems with it. Every fu'ivla that starts with
a consonant and ends in a single vowel and is not "nice" (as defined in
http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/nice%20fu%27ivla%20forms )
can get a rafsi.
What about allowing rafsi ending in V'y for those forms that end in more
than one vowel (but not a diphthong)? So for example a fu'ivla like
{sarpra'i} could have sarpra'y- as a rafsi. That would leave very
few forms without rafsi, besides all those that start with a vowel.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com