[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: [jboske] anaphora & glorking (was: RE: sane kau? (was: RE: Re: RE: Re: lo'edu'u



At 04:02 PM 12/18/02 +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
la and cusku di'e
>Lojbab:
> > Long scope prenex before connected sentences requires forethought, and
> > hence tu'e/tu'u, which is probably an underutilized feature of the
>language
>
>Definitely. "+1". (This message sent because it's nice to point out
>occasions when we agree!)

I agree too, but I'm not sure Lojbab realizes that he's
advocating a change in the baselined grammar. The current
grammar does not permit the second connected sentence to
have its own prenex.

Yes it does, but it needs to be inside tu'e/tu'u

prenex sentence ije tu'e prenex sentence tu'u

lojbab

--
lojbab                                             lojbab@hidden.email
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA                    703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org