[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE:



xorxes:
> I'm surprised that {prenex tu'e ... tu'u} is not grammatical!
> I wanted to write:
> 
>          da poi broda zo'u tu'e da broda
>          ............ 
>          ... da ...... tu'u
> 
> But it is not grammatical

Isn't tu'e introduced in the book with exactly such an example?
(Hard for me to check right now, because I haven't yet found
a way of searching my e-copy of woldy.)
--And.