Re: Re: RE: Re: [jboske] lo'e

From: Adam Raizen <araizen@hidden.email>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:12:06 +0200
Subject: Re: Re: RE: Re: [jboske] lo'e
To: "jboske@yahoogroups.com" <jboske@yahoogroups.com>

de'i li 2002-10-25 ti'u li 13:29:00 la'o zoi. Jorge Llambias .zoi cusku di'e

>When I proposed that I was assuming that voi/voi'i included
>specificity, not just non-veridicality. If they don't then
>change to:
>
>broda lo'e brode --> kairbroda tu'o ka ce'u cmima lo'i brode
>broda le'e brode --> kairbroda tu'o ka ce'u cmima le'i brode

So what would be an example where you would use 'le'ei' instead of 'lo'ei'?

mu'o mi'e .adam.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Re: RE: Re: [jboske] lo'e
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@hidden.email>

Prev by Date: Re: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate into shape
Next by Date: Re: [jboske] loi'e & truthconditions (was: RE: carving the lo'e debate into shape
Previous by thread: Re: RE: Re: [jboske] lo'e
Next by thread: RE: Re: RE: Re: [jboske] lo'e
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread