[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
John:
> And Rosta scripsit:
>
> > So do you accept that {lo blanu} does not mean the same as
> > {da poi blanu}, then?
>
> No, not for blanu.
Does that mean you do think that {lo blanu} != {da poi blanu},
or that you think they do mean the same? (Please don't just
answer Yes! -- This is an alternatives question.)
> Some brivla places subcategorize for "set" or
> "mass", and lo-constructions involving them generate sets or masses
> respectively, but they are sets or masses *seen as* individuals
--And.