[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134



John:
> And Rosta scripsit:
> 
> > I agree. Argument with you is futile. Consequently if you keep trying
> > to participate in arguments then any sort of collaboration with you
> > on Lojban is futile 
> 
> Not at all 
> 
> If lojbab couldn't be convinced by any means whatever, then collab
> would be futile, but he can be -- by the consensus of opinions 
> So the right thing to do with a lojbab posting is not to argue back,
> but to (in Smullyan's phrase) "try to see in what sense he may be right" 
> There's often a lot of value in it 

I am aware from experience elsewhere in life, that this is one of my 
blindspots. So I had better watch you and see if I can learn how it
is done.

I do know that sometimes Lojbab's ideas are good. But usually by
the time I get to them I am too dismissive or too apoplectic to 
notice.

--And.