[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
John:
> pycyn@hidden.email scripsit:
>
> > > That may be right, but my recollection is that it was picked in
> the belief
> > > (over my objection, of course) that {ro} included 0
> >
> > I certainly didn't think so when I was writing CLL
> > >>
> > Which was at least two years after the discussion -- live and learn
>
> No, I meant "When I was writing CLL, I believed that 'roda' implied
> 'su'oda'"
but obviously you didn't think that {lo ro broda} implied {lo su'o
broda}, because otherwise su'o would have been used at the default
as it is for le.
--And.