[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system)



--- In jboske@yahoogroups.com, Jorge "Llambías"
<jjllambias2000@y...>
wrote:
> 
> In my view, lo'e kumte is sometimes female and sometimes male,
sometimes
> it has one hump and sometimes two (and other times none). In many
context
> the question is irrelevant. It is like asking "what does John Cowan
hold
> in his hand?". It varies with context, and in many contexts it is 
> irrelevant. 

This is not quite the message I meant to be responding to, but it's
close.  Also, I'm still in the process of catching up on this
discussion; maybe this has already been dealt with.

Instead of saying that Mr. Bird is "sometimes" carnivore and sometimes
herbivore, sometimes male and sometimes female, it would seem to me
that what makes for a "prototype" are exactly those characteristics
which *are* constant across "almost all" instances of the critter.  So
Mr. Bird has no specific size (though its size is limited to between
an inch or so and 10-odd feet), nor a gender, nor a diet, but does
have feathers, a beak, two wings, is warm-blooded, etc.

This kind of thing will work in non-instantiated situations
(naturally, if I "see" Mr. Bird then that could make "being seen by
me" a characteristic, and it isn't, as has been noted).  When I Want
"a bird", then I'm wanting something warm-blooded, two-winged,
scaly-legged, blahdiblah, but not with any particular gender, etc. 
When I see "a bird," that's an instantiation and necessarily
enumerable; that's "lo cipni" not "lo'e cipni".

I don't fully follow Nick's Four Settings of Wanting, Seeking,
Fearing, Depicting; somehow I can't believe that those are the only
situations where intension/prototype is required (what about "I like
birds"?).  Maybe all cases fall into categories with those... the
exact distinction between them needs clarification.  But taking the
view above, that "lo'e cipni" is some notional critter embodying those
qualities, and only those qualities, that are attributed to "all"
birds (in scare-quotes), let's see, how does that fit?  When I Want
lo'e cipni, that works...  Same for Seeking, and I think Fearing,
though Depicting is necessarily fleshed out with other features.

I'm still at the low end of this discussion, so bear with me...

~mark