[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] lVi & xod-collectives



xorxes:
> la and cusku di'e
>
> > What do people make of my suggestion that loi/lei/lai be
xod-collectives?
> > The result would leave all the gadri well-defined (apart from
lo'e/le'e).
>
> Would the quantified forms differ from the lo/le/la versions?

Quantified forms are analogous to lo/le/la. They don't yield a distinct
meaning when quantifying over members, but they do when quantifying over
avatars
and subkinds.

See http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/XXS%3A%20Extended%20XS%20proposal


--And.