[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

Re: [jboske] lVi & xod-collectives

• From: Jorge "Llamb�as" <jjllambias2000@hidden.email>
• Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 08:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
• Subject: Re: [jboske] lVi & xod-collectives
• To: jboske@yahoogroups.com

la and cusku di'e

> What do people make of my suggestion that loi/lei/lai be xod-collectives?
> The result would leave all the gadri well-defined (apart from lo'e/le'e).

Would the quantified forms differ from the lo/le/la versions?

mu'o mi'e xorxes



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [jboske] lVi & xod-collectives
    • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@hidden.email>

• References:
  • lVi & xod-collectives
    • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@hidden.email>

• Prev by Date: Re: [jboske] LAhE, ME & XS
• Next by Date: extending XS to other gadri
• Previous by thread: lVi & xod-collectives
• Next by thread: Re: [jboske] lVi & xod-collectives
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread