[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:59:35PM +0100, And Rosta wrote:
> # And Rosta scripsit:
> # > Refresh my memory, for BPFK purposes. There are competing views about
> # > whether the rules for identifying the antecedent for {ri} are, or should be,
> # > vague or precise. But has anybody proposed precise rules for ra and ru?
> #
> # They are deliberately imprecise.
>
> I know, John. I just want to make sure that as BF shepherd I take
> account of all proposals & povs. (Is "povs" the plural of "pov"?)
[...]
What john said, except to note that ra is almost always (always?)
going to be the one immediately before the ri.
--
Jordan DeLong - fracture@hidden.email
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku
Attachment:
bin7yzCpieJIz.bin
Description: application/ygp-stripped