[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: [jboske] putative tense scope effects (was: RE: Concrete examples ofLlambanlo'e



My question, then, is what is the difference between CLL & xod's
versions, and for each version, how can the other be said in
Std lojban?

--And.

> la and cusku di'e
>
> >xorxes:
> > > la and cusku di'e
> > >
> > > >Certainly there is a difference between
> > > >
> > > >  There is a man such that all week it has been the case
> > > >  that John hits him
> > > >
> > > >  All week it has been the case that there is a man that John hits
> > > >=At no time during the week has it been false that there is a man
> > > >  that John hits
> > > >
> > > >I would have thought that
> > > >
> > > >  la djan cu darxi lo nanmu ze'a le jeftu
> > > >  la djan cu darxi ze'a le jeftu lo nanmu
> > > >
> > > >would respectively be the ways to express the two meanings. But I may
> > > >be wrong -- afaik, this precise point has never been discussed before
> > >
> > > I think that is not the way. I think {ze'a} refers to a single
> > > interval and not to all points in an interval as points
> > > To get that we have {roroi}:
> > >
> > >    la djan cu darxi lo nanmu roroi le jeftu
> > >    There is a man such that John hits him every
> > >    time during the week
> > >
> > >    la djan cu darxi roroi le jeftu lo nanmu
> > >    Every time during the week, there is a man that
> > >    John hits
> > >
> > > But {ze'a} should be a singular term
> >
> >Okay, but then you wrote:
> >
> > >     la djan cu darxi lo nanmu ze'a lo jetfu
> > >
> > > CLL reading:
> > >
> > >     su'o da poi nanmu zo'u (la djan cu darxi da ze'a lo jetfu)
> > >     There is at least one man x such that: (John hits x all week)
> > >
> > > xod's reading:
> > >
> > >     (su'o da poi nanmu zo'u la djan cu darxi da) ze'a lo jeftu
> > >     (There is at least one man that John hits) that happens all week
> > >
> > > [xod's] reading is what I want to say. I don't want to say that any
> > > single man was hit all week, John may have hit a different man each
> > > day, for example. But the CLL reading with {lo} says that at
> > > least one of the men was hit all week
> >
> >So what is the difference between your and my versions?
>
> I quoted the whole post because I don't understand the question
>
> You suggest there is a difference between:
>
> > > >  la djan cu darxi lo nanmu ze'a le jeftu
> > > >  la djan cu darxi ze'a le jeftu lo nanmu
>
> I claim they are both the same: the first one in your
> interpretation
>
> Xod also thinks they are both the same, but he thinks
> they correspond to the second one in your interpretation
>
> You give relevant scope to both {ze'a} and {lo}
> I only give relevant scope to {lo} and take {ze'a} as
> a singular term. Xod gives relevant scope to neither
> of them. His interpretation (against CLL) matches my
> original {la djan cu darxi lo'ei nanmu ze'a le jeftu}
>
> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Surf the Web without missing calls!�Get MSN Broadband.
> http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> jboske-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>