[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] RE: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: RE: Digest Number 134



Nick Nicholas scripsit:

> The BPFK (if I ever get it started) considers what gets added to the 
> CLL prescription. Founder intent is of interest, but is not decisive, 
> and is assuredly not canonical. tu'o = mo'ezo'e is not in the CLL 
> prescription. And I for one don't want it there either.

I agree.  This implies fixing the ma'oste.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@hidden.email  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
Promises become binding when there is a meeting of the minds and consideration
is exchanged. So it was at King's Bench in common law England; so it was
under the common law in the American colonies; so it was through more than
two centuries of jurisprudence in this country; and so it is today. 
       --_Specht v. Netscape_