[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, And Rosta wrote:
> xod:
> > On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, And Rosta wrote:
> >
> > > xod:
> > > > da is often used to refer to specific entities that the speaker has in
> > > > mind, and of which the speaker wants to assert the existence, and wants
> > > > to assign a variable
> > >
> > > As far as sentential meaning goes, {da} never refers to a specific entity
> > > But it is true that I can say things like "I have a son", and when I
> > > say that I do have my son in mind, even though "a son" does not refer
> > > to him
> >
> > When you say "I have a son", you're not referring to your own son?
>
> No. I'm not being bloody-minded or counterintuitive here, either.
>
> "I am a father" = "I have a child" = "mi patfu da" = "na ku mi patfu no da"
>
> These just say that there is something/someone that is my child,
> or, equivalently, that it is untrue that there is nothing/noone that
> is my child.
This must therefore be somewhat meaningless:
"I have a son. He's nine."
--
jipno se kerlo
re mei re mei degji kakne