[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
And Rosta scripsit:
> Because Kinds (and properties) exist by virtue of abstract definition,
> not by virtue of the contingent facts of the local world.
This gets into fuggly issues of essentialism, particularly the attempt
to distinguish between essential and contingent properties.
> > They are swans all right. The question is whether it would be wrong to
> > deny that Mr. Bluebird is a subkind of Mr. Blanu merely because some
> > non-blue bluebirds might be discovered eventually.
>
> I think it would definitely be wrong. Must a bluebird be blue? No.
How do you know that?
> -- According to my definitions of bluebirdhood.
So Kind is subjective?
--
John Cowan jcowan@hidden.email www.ccil.org/~cowan www.reutershealth.com
"If he has seen farther than others,
it is because he is standing on a stack of dwarves."
--Mike Champion, describing Tim Berners-Lee (adapted)