[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Invent Yourself wrote:
> jaika provides us with an identity abstractor. {lo jaika ce'u xunre} is
> one or more individual things that are red.
It provides us with something, but not an identity abstraction. Where did
we go wrong? I think that jaika = seka = poi'i, but I don't think any of
these offer an identity abstraction any more than le gerku or lo gerku
offers the identity of the dog.
--
jipno se kerlo
re mei re mei degji kakne