[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Robert LeChevalier scripsit:
> The concept that what we say is unrelated to what we think (or how we think
> for that matter) seems mind-bogglingly wrong, which is probably why SWH is
> accepted by assumption by most people who presume that language structure
> determines what we say.
BTW, this week's edition of _New Scientist_ magazine has a cover article on
neo-neo-Whorfianism, positioned as anti-Chomskyism.
--
A poetical purist named Cowan [that's me: jcowan@hidden.email]
Once put the rest of us dowan. [on xml-dev]
"Your verse would be sweeter http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
If it only had metre http://www.reutershealth.com
And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan." [overpacked line!] --Michael Kay