[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
| In a message dated 10/28/2002 12:10:44 PM Central Standard Time, a.rosta@hidden.email writes: << > I'm starting to like And's {lo'e mibypre} for >> Maybe -- at least in that peculiar (British?) usage to avoid saying "I" (though does a a rafsied {mi} really count). But for the more general English usage, as another indefinite generic pronoun (better than "you" at least) or the essentially passive usage (the most common?) in German and French I don't see it at all. And, of course, I wonder why such a device is necessary at all, given all the devices Lojban has for doing order shifting and pronominalization. |