[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Yes, you're right. Thanks! Is there a way to do it without the prenex?
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Jorge Llambias wrote:
>
> la xod cusku di'e
>
> >I have not yet worked out the full theory, but my axioms are
> >
> >ca'e la'e ro valsi cu sidbo
> >ca'e la'e piso'o loi sidbo cu zasti
>
> My comment here is not really relevant to the importing thread.
>
> I think you meant: {ca'e ro da poi valsi zo'u la'e da sidbo},
> for every word, its referent is an idea.
>
> I think {la'e ro valsi} does not say "for every word, its referent",
> but rather "the (common) referent of every word". At least this is
> how other members of LAhE work. {lu'o ro valsi} is "the (common)
> mass containing every word", and not "for every word, that word
> considered as a mass".
>
> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> jboske-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
--
"In the Soviet Union, government controls industry. In the United
States, industry controls government. That is the principal
structural difference between the two great oligarchies of our
time." -- Edward Abbey