[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] Re: poi'i, se/te/ve ka



On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, John Cowan wrote:

> Invent Yourself scripsit:
>
> > 1. Because the car is blue 90% of the time, as it's constantly flickering
> > colors?
> >
> > 2. Because we've never seen the car but we're 90% certain it's blue?
> >
> > 3. Because 90% of its surface is blue?
> >
> > 4. Because its color is objectively 90% blue?
> >
> > 5.Because 90% of survey respondents called it blue?
>
> Any or all of these might be evidence for the truthishness of the claim.
> When I said "certainty is neither here nor there," I was talking about
> subjective certainty (= certitude).  Objective uncertainty is a common
> application of fuzzy logic: an OCR device may decide that a blob of ink
> is (90%) an instance of "t", and is not (10%) an instance of "T".
> Some predicates, like "tall", are inherently fuzzy.


It seems to me that this allows my original usage: that "jei by. clani" is
related to B's height.



-- 
// if (!terrorist)
// ignore ();
// else
collect_data ();