[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
la lojbab cusku di'e > But as Cowan wrote last week, JCB wrote that in 1995, and it was a major > change in how Loglanists looked at the gadri from the earlier period. That's right. I learned Loglan after 1995, so I only know the "modern" version. JCB did claim that this version had been true Loglan all the time, just that he had not been always successful at explaining himself, but that might be his view after the fact and not necessarily when you were learning Loglan. > I'll have to dig out some examples, which will include the vintage > explanation of lea. This may take a day or two, as I've got a kid just > home from camp two hours ago and starting band camp tomorrow, and my > daughter starts school on Monday. It would give an interesting historical perspective, but don't worry if it's too much trouble. It shouldn't really affect much our decisions for Lojban. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com