[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
OK, that last message was not meant for jboske.It is a legitimate question though: how is what I'm doing manifestly more or less dangerous for Lojban than what And is doing? because I profess some fundamentalism? But there was nothing about emergent anything in the prescription --- that is purely a creature of jboske. So how am I, too, not merely tinkering?
And I'm sorry, Bob, but in doing jboske work, I do have to ignore you. In the BPFK I do not, inasmuch as you have a vote and jboske is only one faction. But this is not the BPFK forum; this is where some lojbanists come up with proposals that might be presented to the BPFK forum; and where I am trying to steer such solutions towards the broadest acceptability while still serving formal principles. You will not be hindered from rejecting; but we will not be hindered from proposing. If that means you need to tune out of jboske again, then we'll see you with a gadri proposal in a few months.
/// A freshman once observed to me: Nick Nicholas, PhD, On the edge of the Rubicon French/Italian, Univ. of Melbourne. Men don't go fishing. nickn@hidden.email -- Alice Goodman, _Nixon in China_. http://www.opoudjis.net