[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
la djorden cusku di'e
> Congratulations, you've discovered the intensional gadri!
> That's what I use {lo'e} for.
So how about using an experimental cmavo for it? If you're really
using "lo'e" as a zi'o for gadri, why use an existing gadri which
obviously has a definition other than that?
At the time I started using it, experimental cmavo were not
as much in vogue as they are now. I didn't really see it as
an option. If {lo'ei} were officialized I might change to using
that, depending on whether anybody else uses it, and on whether
anybody uses {lo'e} for something else.
Are you saying you think this is equivalent to your buska/sisku stuff? Or just compatible with it?
Compatible, to start with. I can't really say it's equivalent because you haven't given a strict definition. Compare for example with http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/message/9710 where I gave a simlar explanation. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail