[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

RE: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic)

• From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@hidden.email>
• Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:01:30 -0000
• Subject: RE: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic)
• To: <jboske@yahoogroups.com>

xod:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Robert LeChevalier wrote:
> > Approach 1
> > There is only one meaning for ro, with existential import being a
> 
> What's going on here? I was under the impression that the importing of ro
> was an Answered Question 

No. We thought everyone agreed, but when I took John's silence for
consent it turned out that he had (metaphorically) just gone to the
toilet.

--And.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic)
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@hidden.email>

• References:
  • The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic)
    • From: Invent Yourself <xod@hidden.email>

• Prev by Date: RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134))
• Next by Date: RE: [jboske] Substance vs Bit of Substance
• Previous by thread: The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic)
• Next by thread: Re: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread