[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
la pycyn cusku di'e
> assuming each of your spouses > has one and only one bed.Too strong; only requires that each has a bed -- they might all have the same one, which might or might not be the only one in the house. No evidence thisis meant to be a bijection or even a surjection.
Each spouse must have one and only one bed if it's going to be a function. If you allow more than one bed per spouse it is not a function. I did not say that each spouse had to have a different bed, nor that all beds had to be had.
<I have no idea in what context this question might be useful though. You're not even asking that the function be one-to-one, so more than one spouse might end up in the same bed.>So, why is this an objection? Most functions are not 1-1 and are specified onas injections not surjections.
It was not an objection. It was bewilderment as to the circumstances when one would want to use such a sentence. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com