[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
la djan cusku di'e
> then the situation is that 3/4XS covers > everything you want to be able to say, but at the price of > exploiting the redundant lo/loi contrast in SL in order to be > able to also speak of Kinds. I deny that it is redundant except in special cases of place structure subcategorization.
SL: (su'o) lo (ro) broda 4XS: su'o (loi pa) broda SL: ro (lo ro) broda 4XS: ro (loi pa) broda SL: (pisu'o) loi (ro) broda 4XS: loi su'o broda SL: piro loi (ro) broda 4XS: loi ro broda How is the lo/loi contrast not redundant? What else does it cover? mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963