[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Robert LeChevalier scripsit: > I don't think so, since I am inclined to the original mathematical meaning > for the set descriptor, since that is why it was added (and as pc noted, it > is also used by scientists and logicians - and probably computer > programmers, which constitutes a large portion of our current constituency) Jbosets will continue to have all the mathematical properties, so no problem there. But for example, a set may be a se ralju, though there is no mathematical treatment of "leaders of sets". The fact that mathematicians never developed a theory of set leaders doesn't mean that our sets can't have leaders. In general, whenever a property is emergent only (like leadership; you are the leader of LLG but not of the members of LLG), then we predicated it of a set when constructing the gimste. -- He made the Legislature meet at one-horse John Cowan tank-towns out in the alfalfa belt, so that jcowan@hidden.email hardly nobody could get there and most of http://www.reutershealth.com the leaders would stay home and let him go http://www.ccil.org/~cowan to work and do things as he pleased. --Mencken, _Declaration of Independence_