[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps

On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, John Cowan wrote:

> Invent Yourself scripsit:
>
> > This means that djuno contains two claims: by. jinvi cy., and mi jinvi cy.
> > Just like in English. Blech. And then djuno4 is useless: it's always tu'a
> > mi
>
> Well, in one sense, but I conceive the point of d4 to be to distinguish
> which of multiple possible epistemologies I am entertaining.  Perhaps I
> distinguish physical and theological truth, e.g. (NOMA).


Which means I *can* say mi zgana le za'i le'e xriso seljda cu djuno ko'a
goi le du'u le nu nalspeni gletu cu xlali .i ku'i mi na jinvi ja krici
ko'a, which is really all I wanted.




-- 
// if (!terrorist)
// ignore ();
// else
collect_data ();