[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps



Invent Yourself scripsit:

> This means that djuno contains two claims: by. jinvi cy., and mi jinvi cy.
> Just like in English. Blech. And then djuno4 is useless: it's always tu'a
> mi

Well, in one sense, but I conceive the point of d4 to be to distinguish
which of multiple possible epistemologies I am entertaining.  Perhaps I
distinguish physical and theological truth, e.g. (NOMA).

-- 
John Cowan                                <jcowan@hidden.email>     
http://www.reutershealth.com              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Yakka foob mog.  Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork.  Chumble spuzz.
    -- Calvin, giving Newton's First Law "in his own words"