[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, And Rosta wrote: > > > > (Any usage which does is incorrect, and should probably be using > > > > ti/ta/tu). The difference between da and ko'a is the same as between le > > > > and lo > > > > > > See chapter 7;3 to see why ti is unusable > > > > I don't see what you're complaining about... > > Without checking the book, I am guessing that the objection to your > use of ti is based on mabla anti-malglico tradition -- in this > instance, the notion that ti with a textual referent is insufficiently > deictic. Book says explicitly that ti is only used for finger pointables; I need something abstract. -- jipno se kerlo re mei re mei degji kakne