[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [jboske] factivity of djuno (was: RE: Gaps and Ungaps



On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:30:14PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, John Cowan wrote:
[...]
> > I can live with either (1) or (2), so (2) it is.
> 
> So you're putting a "valid according to speaker" limitation on the djuno4
> when the speaker is discussing a third-party's "knowing"?
> 

Of course.  Otherwise the speaker would use "krici" or "jinvi" which
don't imply fact.

-- 
Jordan DeLong - fracture@hidden.email
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
                                     sei la mark. tuen. cusku

Attachment: bin1EdsdFMe8Q.bin
Description: application/ygp-stripped