[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

RE: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed

• From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@hidden.email>
• Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:07:33 -0000
• Subject: RE: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed
• To: <jboske@yahoogroups.com>

Is absolutely EVERY jboskeist now having a long dark night of the
lojbo soul?

--And.

> I agree that it was a mistake for me to push, and for others to accept,
> the lambda-based definition of sisku.  This definition must be fixed 
> But how, indeed?
> 
> -- 
> "Do I contradict myself?                        John Cowan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@hidden.email>

• References:
  • Lojban is fxxxed
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@hidden.email>

• Prev by Date: RE: [jboske] talking about 2
• Next by Date: RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134))
• Previous by thread: Lojban is fxxxed
• Next by thread: Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread