[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
John: > And Rosta scripsit: > > > I don't see why le'e should be any different from lo'e. In a context where > > lo'i jbopre cu du le'i prenu, it will be the case that lo'e jbopre cu du > > le'e prenu. > > Very true, and that means that speaking Lojban is part of your > stereotype of persons, or that Lojban-speakers are prototype persons. These'd be "lo'e prenu cu jbopre". "lo'e jbopre cu du le'e prenu" may not mean what I meant (-- the logic of CLL lV'e is hard to work out), but "ro bu'a go lo'e jbopre gi le'e prenu" should be safer: "Something is characteristic of Lojbanists iff it is characteristic of these people". --And.