[YG Conlang Archives] > [jboske group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
pc: > jjllambias@hidden.email writes: > > << > > . I was thinking > whether the "trailing prenex" (should that be called a > "postnex"?) should really reverse the order of quantifiers > or just have general precedence over the body but still in > the usual order. That way we can think of it as an > afterthought continuation of the prenex. > > >> > With strict RPN, which this sorta emulates, the order would be > smallest scope to largest left to right -- the reverse of the prenex > situation. But I think that IS to confusing and the story > "afterthought continuation of prenex" (even if there is no visible > prenex at all) is probably going to be the most usable. I do think > the ida of having such a device is desirable -- and feasible withon > even Lojban. How about zo'au ro da su'o de has left to right scope, as per Jorge's suggestion, but zo'au ro da zo'au su'o de has outer-inner scope, as I would prefer? --And.